Check the details of the Memorandum handed to the DG Chandigarh Police by members of Save Indian Family Foundation Chandigarh at the below links:
http://www.punjabnewsline.com/content/view/22757/143/
http://www.internationalnewsandviews.com/?p=7700
http://newsblaze.com/story/20100123165242mand.nb/topstory.html
http://baretnews.com/story/20100123165301001b.html
http://www.theindiapost.com/2010/01/25/save-indian-family-foundation-submits-memo/
http://www.himalyanpost.com/2010/01/25/save-indian-family-foundation-submits-memo/
http://www.indianewscalling.com/tip.php?tipid=4872
http://redtram.com/go/237242629/
http://buzz.yahoo.com/article/1:8ccfb0687deca3b804785f66e2aa8ad1:65d2961a07c182c53640d44b03ce7df6/Save-Indian-Family-Foundation-Submits-Memo
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2010/20100122/cth2.htm#9
Monday, January 25, 2010
Saturday, January 23, 2010
BECHARA PATI KYA KARE?
Agar aurat par haath uthaya to ZAALIM , agar na uthaya to BUZDIL
Aurat ko kisi ke saath dekh kar daante to JEALOUS , agar na kare to BE-GAIRAT
Ghar se bahar rahe to AAWARA, Hamesha ghar mein rahe to NAKARA
Bachchon ko daante to ZAALIM , agar na daante to BE-PARWAH
Biwi ko job se roke to SHAKKI , aur na roke to "KAMAI KHANE WAALA"
Kamini Auraton ki duniya mein "PATI KARE TO KYA KARE???"
Aurat ko kisi ke saath dekh kar daante to JEALOUS , agar na kare to BE-GAIRAT
Ghar se bahar rahe to AAWARA, Hamesha ghar mein rahe to NAKARA
Bachchon ko daante to ZAALIM , agar na daante to BE-PARWAH
Biwi ko job se roke to SHAKKI , aur na roke to "KAMAI KHANE WAALA"
Kamini Auraton ki duniya mein "PATI KARE TO KYA KARE???"
Friday, January 22, 2010
CANDLE LIGHT PROTEST AGAINST DOWRY LAWS
CANDLE LIGHT PROTEST AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT AND IPC 498A MISUSE
CALL HELPLINE: 9646389140, 9815294659
SIFF CHANDIGARH
Memorandum to DGP Chandigarh by SIFF
Section 498-A Misuse
NGO submits memo to DGP
Tribune News Service
Chandigarh, January 21
Members of the Save Indian Family Foundation (SIFF), an NGO, fighting against
the misuse of pro-women laws, submitted a memorandum to DGP SK Jain at the UT
Police Headquarters in Sector 9, here today.
UT SP (Operations) RS Ghumman accepted the memorandum and assured that adequate
steps would be taken to stop the misuse of all pro-woman laws, especially
Section 498-A of the IPC, in the city.
Ghumman reportedly assured members of the NGO that the orders had already been
issued to the authorities concerned and officials to conduct free and fair probe
and arrest anybody only after exhausting all resources available.
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2010/20100122/chd.htm
NGO submits memo to DGP
Tribune News Service
Chandigarh, January 21
Members of the Save Indian Family Foundation (SIFF), an NGO, fighting against
the misuse of pro-women laws, submitted a memorandum to DGP SK Jain at the UT
Police Headquarters in Sector 9, here today.
UT SP (Operations) RS Ghumman accepted the memorandum and assured that adequate
steps would be taken to stop the misuse of all pro-woman laws, especially
Section 498-A of the IPC, in the city.
Ghumman reportedly assured members of the NGO that the orders had already been
issued to the authorities concerned and officials to conduct free and fair probe
and arrest anybody only after exhausting all resources available.
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2010/20100122/chd.htm
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Effect of Divorce on Indian Men:
Effect of Divorce on Indian Men:
Most dangerous stage for men is, awaiting for divorce than after divorce as marriage disputes in India, irrespective the man is right or wrong (they had been abused, blackmailed, treated as Free ATM machine in front of society/police/court every where in India as in India the marriage disputes had been termed as crime for men, not for women) and waiting for divorce and the suicide stastics of crime bure report reflects the same.
Before marriage the men suicide in the rang of 56K vs women 28K
After divorce in the range of 600, both for men vs women.
After divorce the men’s life became more comfortable or worse, it depends purely on how troublesome was his marriage, what type of Divorce litigations he faced.
Perception shift:
Till 1990 or 2000, the basic perceptions were, a divorced woman is means she is a liberated women and a divorced men means he is a wife beater/abuser.
But 2000 onwards the same got changed and the society slowly accepted that A divorced men also can be victims of Domestic violence in terms of finciancial abuse, mental abuse, sexual abuse , physical abuse and the same reflects in the Suicide stastics of Men vs Women. As the divorce rate will increase more and more the same perception change will increase more, some one like it or hate it, that is the fact of irony.
Effect of Divorce on Men:
1. Finciancial effect: Huge irrespective he is right or wrong.
2. Government support : No men welfare ministry and no shelter homes.
3. Emotional effect: Depend on type of trouble he faced and type of divorce he got.
4. Loss of child access: Major problem and maximum divorced men suicide related to that.
5. Social effect: It is not exactly loss, his the social and networking circle got changed, attract towards more unclear family instead of joint family.
6. Future effect: Suicide after divorce: since 2004 it is decreasing.
7. JOB satisfactions: Get better and able to concentrate more on Professional front.
Remarriage:
1. Enjoy their work place much better than previous.
2. Spend more money for their self satisfactions of life.
3. Get less angry for small issue.
4. Became less expected in life.
5. 90% got remarried with in less than 3 years.
With the present set up , when the country like USA , who had more than 50% divorce, their child taken the marriage more workable and the rate is reducing, the country like India and Asian country is increasing and that is the cycle , as we always think the rivers other side is better than our side.
Most dangerous stage for men is, awaiting for divorce than after divorce as marriage disputes in India, irrespective the man is right or wrong (they had been abused, blackmailed, treated as Free ATM machine in front of society/police/court every where in India as in India the marriage disputes had been termed as crime for men, not for women) and waiting for divorce and the suicide stastics of crime bure report reflects the same.
Before marriage the men suicide in the rang of 56K vs women 28K
After divorce in the range of 600, both for men vs women.
After divorce the men’s life became more comfortable or worse, it depends purely on how troublesome was his marriage, what type of Divorce litigations he faced.
Perception shift:
Till 1990 or 2000, the basic perceptions were, a divorced woman is means she is a liberated women and a divorced men means he is a wife beater/abuser.
But 2000 onwards the same got changed and the society slowly accepted that A divorced men also can be victims of Domestic violence in terms of finciancial abuse, mental abuse, sexual abuse , physical abuse and the same reflects in the Suicide stastics of Men vs Women. As the divorce rate will increase more and more the same perception change will increase more, some one like it or hate it, that is the fact of irony.
Effect of Divorce on Men:
1. Finciancial effect: Huge irrespective he is right or wrong.
2. Government support : No men welfare ministry and no shelter homes.
3. Emotional effect: Depend on type of trouble he faced and type of divorce he got.
4. Loss of child access: Major problem and maximum divorced men suicide related to that.
5. Social effect: It is not exactly loss, his the social and networking circle got changed, attract towards more unclear family instead of joint family.
6. Future effect: Suicide after divorce: since 2004 it is decreasing.
7. JOB satisfactions: Get better and able to concentrate more on Professional front.
Remarriage:
1. Enjoy their work place much better than previous.
2. Spend more money for their self satisfactions of life.
3. Get less angry for small issue.
4. Became less expected in life.
5. 90% got remarried with in less than 3 years.
With the present set up , when the country like USA , who had more than 50% divorce, their child taken the marriage more workable and the rate is reducing, the country like India and Asian country is increasing and that is the cycle , as we always think the rivers other side is better than our side.
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
What the HELL is - Legally Wedded Wife?
A married woman can just be a wife. If she is not covered under this single word then the only second possible word for her is - BITCH.
Then why create chaos for the term - "Legally wedded wife"
This explains the difference:
A wife in addition to acquiring the legal status of wife after marriage and
resultant rights as per the provisions of various laws of the land has also
certain duties and marital obligations towards her husband and family. A pious
wife, as one of the parties to a marriage, undoubtedly has the obligation to, as
far as possible and as long as possible, maintain the marriage by her
sanctimonious acts and deeds. The institution of marriage is more than a legal
relationship which is based on trust, faith, devotion and loyalty, being the
pillars of this association.
A cruel wife morally devoids herself of any benevolence. A lady who is cruel
and not sincere and pious in her relationship with her husband and family
ethically loses all her rights and privileges, although she continues to enjoy
and exercise the legal status of wife. She through her acts of continuous
bickering and perpetual bitterness leading to immorality wrecks the relationship
beyond the hope of salvage.
A legally wedded wife who deserts her husband without any just cause and
reason, performs acts of cruelty and thereafter intends to join the matrimonial
relationship has at least the obligation to justify her previous actions of
cruelty. A legally wedded wife having the sole objective of settling personal
vendetta against the her husband and his parents cannot be allowed to continue
the acts of cruelty and torture without any justification and reasons there-for
under the pretext of being a legally wedded wife and taking undue favour of her
legal rights.
Then why create chaos for the term - "Legally wedded wife"
This explains the difference:
A wife in addition to acquiring the legal status of wife after marriage and
resultant rights as per the provisions of various laws of the land has also
certain duties and marital obligations towards her husband and family. A pious
wife, as one of the parties to a marriage, undoubtedly has the obligation to, as
far as possible and as long as possible, maintain the marriage by her
sanctimonious acts and deeds. The institution of marriage is more than a legal
relationship which is based on trust, faith, devotion and loyalty, being the
pillars of this association.
A cruel wife morally devoids herself of any benevolence. A lady who is cruel
and not sincere and pious in her relationship with her husband and family
ethically loses all her rights and privileges, although she continues to enjoy
and exercise the legal status of wife. She through her acts of continuous
bickering and perpetual bitterness leading to immorality wrecks the relationship
beyond the hope of salvage.
A legally wedded wife who deserts her husband without any just cause and
reason, performs acts of cruelty and thereafter intends to join the matrimonial
relationship has at least the obligation to justify her previous actions of
cruelty. A legally wedded wife having the sole objective of settling personal
vendetta against the her husband and his parents cannot be allowed to continue
the acts of cruelty and torture without any justification and reasons there-for
under the pretext of being a legally wedded wife and taking undue favour of her
legal rights.
Women Reservation Bill - A Murder of Democracy
The Women's Reservation Bill has been at the center stage of debate since over a decade. Having introduced for the first time in 1996, the bill has undergone several layers of criticism. And in the last general elections, every political party promised the bill just to garner votes from the women lobby. But still, the political parties failed miserably in displaying integrity as no political party could cross the 10% "glass-ceiling" limit of fielding women candidates.
And now, in order to set record straight, the Govt. is headed to make the 81st Constitutional Amendment to make way for the bill. In layman words, the constitutional amendment reserves 1/3rd of Lok Sabha seats for women candidates and each constituency would be reserved once in every three election terms on a rotation basis.
Put other way round, men in the reserved constituencies will not be allowed to contest elections i.e. their choice to contest elections would be trampled upon only because of their gender. This is nothing but direct discrimination against men and that too those men who never stopped any woman from contesting elections nor have raised any objection to election tickets being given to women by the political parties. Not only that, the citizens of that particular constituency would be forced to select their political representative from a group of women only i.e. their choice to have their own representative will also be done away with.
Now the political parties, allowing them to be hijacked by fund chasing gender obsessed radical feminists, are infringing on the Constitutional Right of men to stand up in elections from their constituency. But the real problem does not lie with the men whose constitutional rights are being attacked. The real problem lies with the political parties and the stubborn old male politicians. The stubborn old male politicians (currently comprising 90% in the power circles) are simply not ready to give up their "Power Positions" to women and this deficit is not being filled by disallowing male politicians to continue in politics but by sabotaging the future prospects young potential male politicians.
It is analogous to a doctor performing by-pass surgery for knee fracture only because a heart surgeon is available and the orthopedic is too stubborn to perform the surgery or just because I do not have an underwear, I will take another person's shirt. Does that make any sense?
When Sonia Gandhi herself is not ready to risk a major revolution inside Congress parties by fielding 100 women candidates, why are the citizens, especially men, being told to risk a mutilated constitution. This act cannot be termed anything short of "Broad daylight murder of democracy" in order to retain power positions.
Moreover, even the Upper House of the Parliament - the Rajya Sabha has only 10% representation of women. What is stopping the Rajya Sabha members to imbibe more women into their cabinet when the Rajya Sabha is independent of the national elections and the electorate? It is clearly evident that the favorite activity of subverting men and their rights is actually being piggybacked in the name of this Constitutional Amendment under the carpet of Women's Reservation bill and being labeled as "Women Empowerment".
Is "Women's Empowerment impossible without Male Entrapment?"
When Kiran Majumdar Shaw can contest elections from any constituency of Bangalore, then even Vijay Malaya should be able to, but with the current constitutional amendment, if the constituency of Bangalore South gets reserved for women, then still Kiran Majumdar Shaw would be able to but Vijay Malaya would not be able to. Why should men put up with such bias?
Some more points worth noting:
1. Even after tabling the bill twice, the Congress party failed to inspire any confidence of higher representation of women [1], what is the guarantee that they will not fail again, after mutilating the Constitution?
2. If truly and actually they have the will to increase the participation of women in mainstream politics, why do they need a bill for that?
3. If the old male politicians are not allowing increased women participation why the price should be paid by the citizens?
4. Why should the future unborn generations of men, for all time to come, suffer from a raped Constitution and be disallowed to have their choice to contest in elections or select their representative only because of their gender?
5. Are women being considered any less capable than men that they cannot live without reservations and extra-concessions? And if that is so, then any amount of concessions is not going to work. In such a scenario how long are men being forced to live life like second-class citizens?
Earlier, the Govt. could easily pass another unconstitutional anti-male law and satisfy the fund chasing gender obsessed radical feminists in order to retain the power positions of the stubborn old male politicians. But, now things have changed. Now, citizens have launched a powerful tirade against such biased anti-male laws and thus, now the Govt. has come up with another sinister master-plan to retain power positions for stubborn old male politicians.
It is going forward to amend the Constitution so that all future generations of men pay the price of the stubbornness of this current generation of old males who cannot forego power even in their dusky days.
It is very clear, that under the barb and paradoxical veil of "Women Reservation Bill", actually the Govt. is murdering democracy in order to satisfy the greed and power hunger of stubborn old male politicians.
The onus now lies on citizens. Do they accept a mutilated constitution and allow democracy to be murdered in broad daylight or voice their opposition against "Reservation of Constituencies"?
If you feel you should speak up against this proposed murder of democracy and rape of Constitution, feel free to spread this article everywhere and to all and sundry.
And now, in order to set record straight, the Govt. is headed to make the 81st Constitutional Amendment to make way for the bill. In layman words, the constitutional amendment reserves 1/3rd of Lok Sabha seats for women candidates and each constituency would be reserved once in every three election terms on a rotation basis.
Put other way round, men in the reserved constituencies will not be allowed to contest elections i.e. their choice to contest elections would be trampled upon only because of their gender. This is nothing but direct discrimination against men and that too those men who never stopped any woman from contesting elections nor have raised any objection to election tickets being given to women by the political parties. Not only that, the citizens of that particular constituency would be forced to select their political representative from a group of women only i.e. their choice to have their own representative will also be done away with.
Now the political parties, allowing them to be hijacked by fund chasing gender obsessed radical feminists, are infringing on the Constitutional Right of men to stand up in elections from their constituency. But the real problem does not lie with the men whose constitutional rights are being attacked. The real problem lies with the political parties and the stubborn old male politicians. The stubborn old male politicians (currently comprising 90% in the power circles) are simply not ready to give up their "Power Positions" to women and this deficit is not being filled by disallowing male politicians to continue in politics but by sabotaging the future prospects young potential male politicians.
It is analogous to a doctor performing by-pass surgery for knee fracture only because a heart surgeon is available and the orthopedic is too stubborn to perform the surgery or just because I do not have an underwear, I will take another person's shirt. Does that make any sense?
When Sonia Gandhi herself is not ready to risk a major revolution inside Congress parties by fielding 100 women candidates, why are the citizens, especially men, being told to risk a mutilated constitution. This act cannot be termed anything short of "Broad daylight murder of democracy" in order to retain power positions.
Moreover, even the Upper House of the Parliament - the Rajya Sabha has only 10% representation of women. What is stopping the Rajya Sabha members to imbibe more women into their cabinet when the Rajya Sabha is independent of the national elections and the electorate? It is clearly evident that the favorite activity of subverting men and their rights is actually being piggybacked in the name of this Constitutional Amendment under the carpet of Women's Reservation bill and being labeled as "Women Empowerment".
Is "Women's Empowerment impossible without Male Entrapment?"
When Kiran Majumdar Shaw can contest elections from any constituency of Bangalore, then even Vijay Malaya should be able to, but with the current constitutional amendment, if the constituency of Bangalore South gets reserved for women, then still Kiran Majumdar Shaw would be able to but Vijay Malaya would not be able to. Why should men put up with such bias?
Some more points worth noting:
1. Even after tabling the bill twice, the Congress party failed to inspire any confidence of higher representation of women [1], what is the guarantee that they will not fail again, after mutilating the Constitution?
2. If truly and actually they have the will to increase the participation of women in mainstream politics, why do they need a bill for that?
3. If the old male politicians are not allowing increased women participation why the price should be paid by the citizens?
4. Why should the future unborn generations of men, for all time to come, suffer from a raped Constitution and be disallowed to have their choice to contest in elections or select their representative only because of their gender?
5. Are women being considered any less capable than men that they cannot live without reservations and extra-concessions? And if that is so, then any amount of concessions is not going to work. In such a scenario how long are men being forced to live life like second-class citizens?
Earlier, the Govt. could easily pass another unconstitutional anti-male law and satisfy the fund chasing gender obsessed radical feminists in order to retain the power positions of the stubborn old male politicians. But, now things have changed. Now, citizens have launched a powerful tirade against such biased anti-male laws and thus, now the Govt. has come up with another sinister master-plan to retain power positions for stubborn old male politicians.
It is going forward to amend the Constitution so that all future generations of men pay the price of the stubbornness of this current generation of old males who cannot forego power even in their dusky days.
It is very clear, that under the barb and paradoxical veil of "Women Reservation Bill", actually the Govt. is murdering democracy in order to satisfy the greed and power hunger of stubborn old male politicians.
The onus now lies on citizens. Do they accept a mutilated constitution and allow democracy to be murdered in broad daylight or voice their opposition against "Reservation of Constituencies"?
If you feel you should speak up against this proposed murder of democracy and rape of Constitution, feel free to spread this article everywhere and to all and sundry.
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
LINKS TO CANDLE LIGHT PROTEST IN CHANDIGARH
http://www.theindiapost.com/2010/01/05/we-unwelcome-year-2010-victims/
http://www.internationalnewsandviews.com/?p=7010
http://www.himalyanpost.com/2010/01/05/we-unwelcome-year-2010-victims/
http://newsblaze.com/story/20100104151548mand.nb/topstory.html
http://www.newkerala.com/news/fullnews-22260.html
http://www.centralchronicle.com/viewnews.asp?articleID=23310
http://74.125.153.132/search?q=cache:Qv-dpEqcnrIJ:www.uniindia.com/unilive%255Cunisite.nsf/All/619EA14FB1F7C50D6525769D004CBFD0+candle+march+by+dowry+victims&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=in
http://newsrack.in/stories/indiatogether/Human+Rights/3?start=21
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2010/20100101/cth1.htm#14
http://www.indianewscalling.com/print.php?tipid=4205
http://buzz.yahoo.com/article/1:8ccfb0687deca3b804785f66e2aa8ad1:1a4e9900a7d86396494d45c4840da28b/We-Unwelcome-Year-2010-Victims
http://buzz.yahoo.com/article/1:8ccfb0687deca3b804785f66e2aa8ad1:1a4e9900a7d86396494d45c4840da28b/We-Unwelcome-Year-2010-Victims
http://www.uniindia.com/unilive/unisite.nsf/All/619EA14FB1F7C50D6525769D004CBFD0
http://news.webindia123.com/news/Articles/India/20091231/1416182.html
http://www.internationalnewsandviews.com/?p=7010
http://www.himalyanpost.com/2010/01/05/we-unwelcome-year-2010-victims/
http://newsblaze.com/story/20100104151548mand.nb/topstory.html
http://www.newkerala.com/news/fullnews-22260.html
http://www.centralchronicle.com/viewnews.asp?articleID=23310
http://74.125.153.132/search?q=cache:Qv-dpEqcnrIJ:www.uniindia.com/unilive%255Cunisite.nsf/All/619EA14FB1F7C50D6525769D004CBFD0+candle+march+by+dowry+victims&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=in
http://newsrack.in/stories/indiatogether/Human+Rights/3?start=21
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2010/20100101/cth1.htm#14
http://www.indianewscalling.com/print.php?tipid=4205
http://buzz.yahoo.com/article/1:8ccfb0687deca3b804785f66e2aa8ad1:1a4e9900a7d86396494d45c4840da28b/We-Unwelcome-Year-2010-Victims
http://buzz.yahoo.com/article/1:8ccfb0687deca3b804785f66e2aa8ad1:1a4e9900a7d86396494d45c4840da28b/We-Unwelcome-Year-2010-Victims
http://www.uniindia.com/unilive/unisite.nsf/All/619EA14FB1F7C50D6525769D004CBFD0
http://news.webindia123.com/news/Articles/India/20091231/1416182.html
Monday, January 4, 2010
CANDLE LIGHT AGAINST 498A IN CHANDIGARH
Chandigarh, December 31
Around 50 persons took out a candle march against the misuse of Section 498-A (dowry harassment) at the Sector 17 plaza here this evening.
They expressed resentment against the apathetic attitude of the government and judiciary towards their sufferings. These persons, who were implicated in “false” dowry harassment cases, termed 2009 as “Black Year”.
They urged the government to curb this “legal terrorism”.
They claimed that hundreds of families were being ruined by the blatant misuse of the law. They appealed to the government to take stern action against those, who misused the law to settle their scores.
(AS PUBLISHED IN THE TRIBUNE ON 1-1-10)
Around 50 persons took out a candle march against the misuse of Section 498-A (dowry harassment) at the Sector 17 plaza here this evening.
They expressed resentment against the apathetic attitude of the government and judiciary towards their sufferings. These persons, who were implicated in “false” dowry harassment cases, termed 2009 as “Black Year”.
They urged the government to curb this “legal terrorism”.
They claimed that hundreds of families were being ruined by the blatant misuse of the law. They appealed to the government to take stern action against those, who misused the law to settle their scores.
(AS PUBLISHED IN THE TRIBUNE ON 1-1-10)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)